For example:

Q1: What are the advantages of hiring a contract PM over using an in-house staffer?
Q2: What are the advantages of using an in-house staff PM over hiring a contractor?

Would such a pair of associated questions be accepted? (and a different question - would they be too subjective?)

  • 2
    what's the actual problem you are facing? Can you add that, or make the problem your question? These seem a tad bit .. contrived. Apr 1, 2011 at 9:12
  • The questions are contrived, but as this is the meta site, I'm seeking additional guidance on what makes a suitable question. I'm sure that there are "real" questions out there that might have different but valid answers depending on the way the question is asked, and rather than trying to massage all of the angles into one complex, hard to answer question, a different approach might make it easier for people to give easily understood answers. I don't intend to ask the two questions about contract v in-house PMs - just using this as an example of the kind of questions that might be asked.
    – Iain9688
    Apr 1, 2011 at 10:39
  • @lain9688 - This is difficult to answer without more details. The advantages and disadvantages vary from situation to situation and depend on many factors. See my answer below on what to include in your question. Additionally, these Tips for Writing Great Questions will help ensure that you encourage more views to your question and more professional answers. Good luck, and thanks for actively seeking feedback on how to better participate on this site :)
    – jmort253
    Apr 2, 2011 at 2:48

2 Answers 2


I think what Jeff Atwood was alluding to in his comment is that the best questions are the ones that involve a real, actual problem that you are facing. What makes these types of questions so special is that the problem is unique to your situation, yet will also add value for other visitors of the site who may be facing a similar problem.

Questions that are contrived tend to be more generic and more like something one would expect to see in a textbook. Additionally, the responses to those questions will likely be short, textbook-style answers with little value to experts or people who have spent a significant amount of time in project management. What really adds value to the Stack Exchange network is the individuality and experience that we see in the questions and answers. That's what makes really great content.

Furthermore, when you ask great questions, you also elicit great answers. Many expert project managers and enthusiasts will have experienced a problem similar to yours, and their shared experiences will add more value to the site than something we can find in a textbook, a manual, or the front-page of Google.

If at all possible, I encourage you to ask your question and include the problem you're facing. Give us the details, and we'll provide great answers that will not only help you, but also it will help this site meet it's goals of becoming great!


What I would expect to see in a situation like this, as with anything that has more than one answer, is two opposing answers both get a lot of upvotes.

To give a simple, trolling example, if someone asked on StackOverflow "Is Java better than C#?" I would expect to see two answers with similar upvotes: "Yes" and "No."

  • No, the question would be closed as subjective in a matter of minutes :) Anyway, we have a lot of questions where completely different approaches are possible and it somehow works fine. After all the site is way more subjective than StackOverflow by default. May 9, 2011 at 20:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .