Timeline for Is the question "How to evaluate your manager/boss?" on topic?
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
5 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feb 22, 2011 at 18:26 | comment | added | Mugen | @jmort253 Ha ha. It was fun reading your comments. You are both awesome and so assertive! I wish I could talk like this. | |
Feb 17, 2011 at 7:01 | comment | added | jmort253 | Perhaps you can elaborate more in your answer or give more information about why this is a good question. I suspect you have a pretty strong, well-thought out, passionate opinion, but your actual documented answer is still a vague, one-liner that I don't currently agree with. Convince me why this is a good question based on what the founders intended this site to be. Find something in the FAQ that I missed. Locate some evidence to convince me otherwise that this question in it's current form fits the guidelines. | |
Feb 17, 2011 at 5:24 | comment | added | Mark Phillips | @jmort253 -really? you're holding my answer hostage until it says what you want it to say? ---in terms of why I believe its on-topic is because he gave the specific situation, just in not so many words e.g. what are objective ways to rate a manager's performance (with emphasis on objective, so personal feelings don't get in the way). The answer would speak to specific performance metrics that a manager could be measured on. | |
Feb 17, 2011 at 4:21 | comment | added | jmort253 | Sorry for the downvote. Nothing personal, but there are way too many one liner questions on here so far that don't meet guidelines in the FAQ. I'll upvote your answer if you edit it and add that it could be on topic if the OP describes his/her experience or asks a more specific question that isn't so broad. Let's work together to make this a success! | |
Feb 16, 2011 at 23:49 | history | answered | Mark Phillips | CC BY-SA 2.5 |