Skip to main content

Timeline for Network unable to cope with flags

Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0

6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 5, 2019 at 15:53 history edited Todd A. JacobsMod CC BY-SA 4.0
added 6 characters in body
Jun 30, 2019 at 22:31 comment added Tiago Peres Knowing how many flags one raised and how many were helpful can reveal a different reality. The difference in values can come from flags being disputed or aged away (except SPAM ones, no have disputed attribute). You claim to know only how many flags were helpful. If that comes in the form of a percentage of total, there's still place for bias. If that's just a number of helpful ones (no total), just like what a user like me sees in another one's profile, that makes harder to control abusive flagging. About the badge, could stand the Marshall one but that's gonna happen when it happens.
Jun 30, 2019 at 21:49 comment added Todd A. Jacobs Mod @TiagoMartinsPeres There are no negative consequences for flag aging, nor for non-abusive levels of flagging. That was the point I was making. You're now solely measured (as far as I can tell) on how many of your flags are marked "helpful," so there's never a decrement applied to the metric. The metric is also largely informational anyway; the system no longer takes flag stats into account in what it shows moderators or other users in the review queue or otherwise. Flag thoughtfully, but treat flag metrics purely as a vanity metric, and then forget about them unless you're chasing a badge.
Jun 30, 2019 at 19:50 comment added Tiago Peres Thanks for the feedback. Flag aging is a bit unfortunate because one doesn't learn from it (in cases we wronged), the community remains the same (or not, sometimes a flag ages and appears again raised from other users) and goes to stats (which can later on have consequences that I'm not yet able to see).
Jun 30, 2019 at 19:45 vote accept Tiago Peres
Jun 30, 2019 at 18:10 history answered Todd A. JacobsMod CC BY-SA 4.0