There's a question on the main page, What are the metrics for software documentation?, that is extremely vague, unclear, and overly broad. As it stands currently, I believe it should most likely be closed as not a real question:
It's difficult to tell what is being asked here. This question is ambiguous, vague, incomplete, overly broad, or rhetorical and cannot be reasonably answered in its current form. For help clarifying this question so that it can be reopened, see the FAQ.
As far as the answers go, do they fully address the question? I'm not 100% sure they do, but that's because the question is vague. The information in the answers is helpful and addresses a problem, and I think both David and Mark Wallace are able to sort of tell what the asker is really asking, so I'm thinking maybe we can fix that with some edits to the question so it's more clear to others.
Remember, maintaining good quality is important to becoming a graduated, productive Stack Exchange Q&A site. So if this particular question has to be closed, so be it, but I'm hoping maybe we can find a way to improve the post instead, as the lessons about wanting to "measure for the sake of measuring" is valuable. Of course, the answer could also be that no editing is required, and that the question is perfect as it is...
What do you think?